When did your deep learning model first disappoint you in production?

Manish Menda
Updated on January 12, 2026 in

Deep learning models often look impressive during training and validation high accuracy, stable loss curves, and strong benchmark results. But once they meet real users and live data, cracks start to appear. Inputs become noisier, edge cases show up more often than expected, and data distributions quietly drift away from what the model learned. Performance doesn’t always collapse overnight; instead, it degrades slowly, making the problem harder to notice and even harder to explain to stakeholders.

  • 1
  • 348
  • 1 month ago
 
on January 3, 2026

This has been a recurring lesson for me, especially working with teams that ship models quickly and then expect them to “hold up” on their own. The first warning signs were never accuracy drops in dashboards—they were operational signals. Teams started questioning individual predictions, business users asked for manual checks, and exceptions quietly increased. The model was still passing its offline benchmarks, but its outputs no longer matched how the business actually behaved.

  • Liked by
Reply
Cancel
Loading more replies